TripAdvisor Sued for Negligent Camel Supervision
In which we will, yet again, discuss the assumption-of-risk doctrine.
In which we will, yet again, discuss the assumption-of-risk doctrine.
“Without any provocation,” allegedly, which seems unlikely but must be taken as true for now.
A slip-and-fall case, but not the one you’d expect.
Before you judge, know that the restroom was allegedly “dank.”
Granted.
Did this case involve a car accident? Of course it involved a car accident.
If this complaint had some delicious cheese melted over it, it might have at least some merit.
It also called the settlement “utterly worthless,” but those words don’t begin with an S.
Hey, it was worth a shot.
We all know it’s coming. (The lawsuit, that is.)