One of those cases that shows the “rational basis” test might be misnamed.
Not killing this guy is about the only thing the SFPD did right here.
No, not between “I” and “Want a Lawyer Dog,” as if he were referring to himself, Mr. Want a Lawyer Dog. Please try to take this more seriously. Dog.
Turns out those who suggested in March (me, for example) that the officers were “probably in some trouble” here were right.
1600 words on this, but I’ve been waiting three years for a decision.
A mass groping would be inexcusable, of course; but also, how exactly do you search 900 high-school students and all their belongings and not find ANY pot?
Probably not necessary to say that the court’s decision was quite favorable to sexy cops.
Maybe the government shouldn’t feel free to treat an innocent elderly woman like a criminal, the opinion strongly suggests.
It seems like they should all have some discernible connection. Doesn’t it?