One of those cases that shows the “rational basis” test might be misnamed.
No, not between “I” and “Want a Lawyer Dog,” as if he were referring to himself, Mr. Want a Lawyer Dog. Please try to take this more seriously. Dog.
Right on target, in fact.
His little Supreme Court is apparently not split 4-4.
Signs with funny squiggles on them popped up in Louisiana, and of course somebody assumed it was part of a terrorist plot.
Not whether to make the Holy Bible the official state book, or whether that would be constitutional. They were arguing about *which* Holy Bible to use.
She just assumed that “religious” meant “Christian,” because … is there another kind?