Presumably only an agricultural court would have jurisdiction over him.
Australian lawyers should be on their best behavior.
Put another way, the prosecution convinced the jury he was guilty of 19.
Turns out the sham chief is probably still at it.
She’d have destroyed them on cross-examination anyway.
A bizarre and stupid mystery.
With bad legal arguments, and bongos.
The sovereign-citizen nonsense is not limited to North America.
She will face a number of obstacles in this particular quest for justice.
There are many great lines Justice Fergus O’Donnell’s opinion in R. v. Duncan (2013), which was an otherwise unremarkable case except that the defendant tried to run one of those “sovereign citizen” defenses up the flagpole. That didn’t go so well:…