A creative solution to a common briefing dilemma.
Not just one, which would be bad enough.
If you need it, that is. And they needed it here.
Cats do funny things. Sometimes in judicial opinions.
Invigilate your eyes on the quintessence of this dispute.
Not recommended for beginners, but this guy got away with it, and well done.
Possibly of interest only to legal writers, but since I am one of those, here it is.
Hopefully the oral argument will also be at least partly in Klingon.
Many of you will be outside this weekend, so a little drone advice seems timely. Or maybe it’s shotgun advice. Take your pick. Ars Technica reported recently that a drone operator in California had prevailed in a legal dispute with…
In last week's opinion in Obergefell v. Hodges, the U.S. Supreme Court again broke new ground and has taken an action that will be debated for years to come. It finally used the word "huh?" in an opinion. This of…